calibration system【地物】 - PMC

Thomas Dowrick, Guofang Xiao, Daniil Nikitichev, Eren Dursun, Niels van Berkel, Moustafa Allam, Bongjin Koo, Joao Ramalhinho, Stephen Thompson, Kurinchi Gurusamy, Ann Blandford, Danail Stoyanov, Brian R. Davidson, Matthew J. Clarkson

Med Phys. 2023 May; 50(5): 2695–2704. Published online 2023 Feb 22. doi: 10.1002/mp.16310

PMCID:: PMC10614700

Article PDF–1.1M

Select item 88399785.

Data-Driven Techniques for Low-Cost Sensor Selection and Calibration for the Use Case of Air Quality Monitoring

Rameez Raja Kureshi, Bhupesh Kumar Mishra, Dhavalkumar Thakker, Reena John, Adrian Walker, Sydney Simpson, Neel Thakkar, Agot Kirsten Wante

Sensors (Basel) 2022 Feb; 22(3): 1093. Published online 2022 Jan 31. doi: 10.3390/s22031093

PMCID:: PMC8839978

Article PDF–13M

Select item 70755346.

A tutorial on calibration measurements and calibration models for clinical prediction models

Yingxiang Huang, Wentao Li, Fima Macheret, Rodney A Gabriel, Lucila Ohno-Machado

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Apr; 27(4): 621–633. Published online 2020 Feb 27. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz228

PMCID:: PMC7075534

Article PDF–1.0M

Select item 80380087.

High-Precision Automatic Calibration Modeling of Point Light Source Tracking Systems

Ruijin Li, Liming Zhang, Xianhua Wang, Weiwei Xu, Xin Li, Jiawei Li, Chunhui Hu

Sensors (Basel) 2021 Apr; 21(7): 2270. Published online 2021 Mar 24. doi: 10.3390/s21072270

PMCID:: PMC8038008

Article PDF–3.2M

Select item 89397988.

Bayesian calibration, process modeling and uncertainty quantification in biotechnology

Laura Marie Helleckes, Michael Osthege, Wolfgang Wiechert, Eric von Lieres, Marco Oldiges

PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 Mar; 18(3): e1009223. Published online 2022 Mar 7. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009223

PMCID:: PMC8939798

Article PDF–6.1M

Select item 86272439.

Detection of Calibration Drift in Clinical Prediction Models to Inform Model Updating

Sharon E. Davis, Robert A. Greevy, Jr, Thomas A. Lasko, Colin G. Walsh, Michael E. Matheny

J Biomed Inform. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2021 Dec 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Biomed Inform. 2020 Dec; 112: 103611. Published online 2020 Nov 4. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103611

PMCID:: PMC8627243

Article PDF–2.1M

Select item 878099510.

Evaluation of Calibration Equations by Using Regression Analysis: An Example of Chemical Analysis

Hsuan-Yu Chen, Chiachung Chen

Sensors (Basel) 2022 Jan; 22(2): 447. Published online 2022 Jan 7. doi: 10.3390/s22020447

PMCID:: PMC8780995

Article PDF–4.2M

Select item 700509711.

A robust method for calibration of eye tracking data recorded during nystagmus

William Rosengren, Marcus Nyström, Björn Hammar, Martin Stridh

Behav Res Methods. 2020; 52(1): 36–50. Published online 2019 Mar 1. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01199-0

PMCID:: PMC7005097

Article PDF–2.9M

Select item 866242212.

CFNet: LiDAR-Camera Registration Using Calibration Flow Network

Xudong Lv, Shuo Wang, Dong Ye

Sensors (Basel) 2021 Dec; 21(23): 8112. Published online 2021 Dec 4. doi: 10.3390/s21238112

PMCID:: PMC8662422

Article PDF–36M

Select item 883800813.

Automating the Calibration of Visible Light Positioning Systems

Robin Amsters, Simone Ruberto, Eric Demeester, Nobby Stevens, Peter Slaets

Sensors (Basel) 2022 Feb; 22(3): 998. Published online 2022 Jan 27. doi: 10.3390/s22030998

PMCID:: PMC8838008

Article PDF–2.2M

Select item 685098114.

The syringe potentiometer: a low-cost device for pneumotachograph calibration

Troy J. Cross, Eli F. Kelley, Tim A. Hardy, Jennifer M. J. Isautier, Bruce D. Johnson

J Appl Physiol (1985) 2019 Oct 1; 127(4): 1150–1162. Published online 2019 Sep 5. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00150.2019

PMCID:: PMC6850981

Article

Select item 779586715.

Vicarious Radiometric Calibration of Ocean Color Bands for FY-3D/MERSI-II at Lake Qinghai, China

Shengli Chen, Xiaobing Zheng, Xin Li, Wei Wei, Shenda Du, Fuxiang Guo

Sensors (Basel) 2021 Jan; 21(1): 139. Published online 2020 Dec 28. doi: 10.3390/s21010139

PMCID:: PMC7795867

Article PDF–7.7M

Select item 666716216.

Calibration with or without phantom for fracture risk prediction in cancer patients with femoral bone metastases using CT-based finite element models

Florieke Eggermont, Nico Verdonschot, Yvette van der Linden, Esther Tanck

PLoS One. 2019; 14(7): e0220564. Published online 2019 Jul 30. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220564

PMCID:: PMC6667162

Article PDF–1.1M

Select item 730905917.

Sensor-to-Segment Calibration Methodologies for Lower-Body Kinematic Analysis with Inertial Sensors: A Systematic Review

Léonie Pacher, Christian Chatellier, Rodolphe Vauzelle, Laetitia Fradet

Sensors (Basel) 2020 Jun; 20(11): 3322. Published online 2020 Jun 11. doi: 10.3390/s20113322

PMCID:: PMC7309059

Article PDF–836K

Select item 926978718.

Microsoft Azure Kinect Calibration for Three-Dimensional Dense Point Clouds and Reliable Skeletons

Laura Romeo, Roberto Marani, Anna Gina Perri, Tiziana D’Orazio

Sensors (Basel) 2022 Jul; 22(13): 4986. Published online 2022 Jul 1. doi: 10.3390/s22134986

PMCID:: PMC9269787

Article PDF–5.0M

Select item 926125819.

Integration of Heterogeneous Biological Data in Multiscale Mechanistic Model Calibration: Application to Lung Adenocarcinoma

Jean-Louis Palgen, Angélique Perrillat-Mercerot, Nicoletta Ceres, Emmanuel Peyronnet, Matthieu Coudron, Eliott Tixier, Ben M. W. Illigens, Jim Bosley, Adèle L’Hostis, Claudio Monteiro

Acta Biotheor. 2022; 70(3): 19. Published online 2022 Jul 7. doi: 10.1007/s10441-022-09445-3

PMCID:: PMC9261258

Article PDF–4.2M

Select item 633319820.

Calibration strategies for use of the nanoDot OSLD in CT applications

Sarah B. Scarboro, Dianna Cody, Francesco C. Stingo, Paola Alvarez, David Followill, Laurence Court, Di Zhang, Michael McNitt‐Gray, Stephen F. Kry

J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Jan; 20(1): 331–339. Published online 2018 Nov 13. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12491

PMCID:: PMC6333198

Article PDF–403K

<< First< Prev

Page of 20211

Next >Last >>

Supplemental Content

Filter your results:

Manage Filters

PMC Images search for calibration system【地物】

Figure 1

The flowchart of the calibration system. The procedures include four phases: the hardware calibration, the USarm operation, the TLarm operation, and the system validation. The hardware calibration included: (a) The transformation between the US image and USarm was calculated via the US image and the designed geometry of the calibration phantom. (b) The transformation between USarm and TLarm was obtained by pointing a set of points on one comment target. For procedures (1) to (4), the coordinate system transformation from the US image to two arms was applied from hardware calibration (a, b). (1) The calibration phantom was scanned by USarm. (2) The coordinate system transformation was applied from US image to USarm. (3) The base-to-base transformation was applied from USarm to TLarm. (4) The TLarm with the standard stylus was moved to the target position via US image planned path from (1). (5) The system was validated by the difference between the target point and the standard stylus point.

Ultrasound Calibration for Dual-Armed Surgical Navigation System

J Healthc Eng. 2022;2022:3362495.
Figure 5.

Calibration results of the laser-based vision system: (a) measurement of the stand-off distance before calibration; (b) measurement of the width before calibration; (c) measurement of the thickness before calibration; (d) measurement of the width after calibration; (e) measurement of the thickness after calibration.

A Laser-Based Vision System for Weld Quality Inspection

Sensors (Basel). 2011;11(1):506-521.
Fig. 1

Multi-sensor system of the rotary-wing UAV and the extrinsic calibration target. a The rotary-wing UAV with multi-sensor system. b AprilTag array used as the calibration target

AprilTag array-aided extrinsic calibration of camera–laser multi-sensor system

Robotics Biomim. 2016;3:13.
Figure 1Gradient calibration protocol flowchart.

Flowchart detailing the processes involved in the protocol and the order in which they should be implemented. The two major subdivisions of the technique are the system calibration (a) and the post-processing correction (b). Expected image deformations are illustrated using schematics.

Is Your System Calibrated? MRI Gradient System Calibration for Pre-Clinical, High-Resolution Imaging

PLoS One. 2014;9(5):e96568.